| |||||||||||
|
~ The Write Way ~ Friday 7 January 2000 ATMs and the Simple Life
Greetings, Phew! We all survived the Big Day; no rioting in the streets, no ATMs spilling out squillions of dollars - not even the teeniest glitch. It was a bit of a fizzer all round really. Not that I'm complaining - give me the Simple Life every time! It seems that there's more to the "third degree" than a couple of Hollywood cops - Brian, from Ontario, writes: "On January 10, I will be 23 years a (Free)mason. I'm also a 32 degree Mason, a Shriner, twice a Past Master (president) and currently the Master of my Lodge. I also have Past Grand Lodge Rank. Terrilynn is quite correct, although the explanation she offers is a bit simplistic. I don't have the time to explain all that is involved and the significance of the "3rd Degree" - and it also involves "Masonic secrets" and so forth. Three is a VERY important number in Masonry - besides the issue of the "degrees" - and I have a very long paper I did some time ago on its use in our fraternity." I've always regarded three as my "lucky number", so I was intrigued to learn this and delighted to receive this information from Leo: "The third degree, thanks to old Hollywood cops and robbers movies, is now synonymous with police interrogation with bright lights and rubber hoses and without the benefits of counsel. But where did this phrase come from? And what are the first two degrees?"The phrase comes from freemasonry. To become a Third-Degree or Master Mason, the highest rank, one must submit to questioning. The questioning associated with a Third-Degree Mason dates to at least 1772. Some sources say the questioning is long and intense, others that it is a mere formality (not being a Mason I don't know), but whichever is true, the idea that the Masons' testing was an ordeal became fixed in the public mind. So, by 1880 the term became used for any long an arduous questioning or interrogation. "Around the turn of the 20th century, the term began to be applied, outside of Masonic rituals, exclusively to police interrogations. The idea of a brutal interrogation being called the third degree was no doubt helped along by association with third-degree burn. "So, there really are no first or second degrees of police brutality." Leo found this at David Wilton's wonderful Useless Knowledge site http://www.uselessknowledge.com/word/third.shtmlYou can see that this, too, is only a simplified version of what is no doubt a complex matter - but at least it gives us a little clue to the origins of this expression. If all this discussion about the number three has whet your appetite and
inspired you to get involved and start writing, you can get 2000 off to a great
start by contacting Suzanne Lieurance, who runs a workshop called "Good
Things Come In Suzanne explains, "Many, many children's stories and fairy tales are
written in the core of three. Why are there so many threes in children's
literature - three bears, three pigs, even three Billy Goats Gruff? It all has
to do with this "Core of Three" which reflects European and Western
culture. And also because the core of three fosters emerging literacy in
children by helping them learn to predict what will happen in a story. If there
are three pigs and a big bad wolf in a story, and the wolf blows down the first
pig's house, children will tell you - "That wolf is going to the second
pig's house next!". Prediction is one major characteristic of a
"good" reader." Coffeehouse for Writers. The next workshop starts January 10th. Since most of us have just emerged from the Silly Season - more or less intact - this seems like an opportune time to discuss humour. "The subject of humour" writes William Hartson in a gem of a book called The Drunken Goldfish - a Celebration of Irrelevant Research, "is no laughing matter." He quotes Arthur Schopenhauer, who, in 1818 defined humour as, "the incongruity between a concept and the real object which it was designed to relate". Hartson continues, "As an example he (Schopenhauer) quoted the humorous riddle: 'What is the angle between a circle and its tangent?' which apparently never failed to have old Schopenhauer falling about helpless with laughter. "Having defined 'Humour', we move on to the question of an individual's reaction to it. This we term 'laughter'. Laughter, wrote Immanuel Kant in 1790, 'is an affectation arising from a sudden transformation of strained expectation into nothing.' "Laughter, according to J.M.Raulier (writing in 1900), 'consists of spasmodic contractions of the large and small zygomatic muscles and sudden relaxations of the diaphragm accompanied by contractions of the larynx and epiglottis.' "The centuries of effort put into finding an acceptable definition of the topic of humour," continues Hartson, "have perhaps best been encapsulated by the contemporary philosopher and genius Mel Brooks, who explained succinctly: 'Tragedy is if I cut my finger. Comedy is if you walk into an open sewer and die.' " What does all this illustrate? That old maxim: it ain't what you say, it's the way that you say it! Language can turn humour into something as dry as dust - if used incorrectly. Consider your audience and your purpose before you put pen to paper. No doubt the audience reading Kant, Schopenhauer or Raulier would have been expecting to see the topic dissected in this way - but far too many writers, writing for the general public, also write like this. The whole reason for the existence of language is communication - to exchange ideas, thoughts and feelings with other people. Whenever you write, stop and check that what you've written can be understood by someone without your knowledge of the subject. You know what you mean ... but will we? Last week's quiz: Match each word in the list with its SYNONYM (similar meaning) below: Poignant, enigmatic, emancipation, derogatory, reticent, circumspect, insidious, vehement, harangue, harass Passionate - VEHEMENT Cautious - CIRCUMSPECT Painful - POIGNANT Treacherous - INSIDIOUS Badger - HARRASS Liberation - EMANCIPATION Diatribe - HARANGUE Disparaging - DEROGATORY Taciturn - RETICENT Puzzling -ENIGMATIC This week's quiz: Write one word for each of the definitions below: Having several wives - Having several husbands - Having three angles - Instrument for taking temperature - Water-generated power - A long-distance camera lens - The study of the sounds of speech - The story of one's own life - Hater of other people - A period of ten years - If you're lucky enough to be on holidays still, then you'll have time to try this little test (also sent in by Leo). Test (Hint: I nearly went batty trying these until I realised that the numbers are a vital part of each clue.) This test does not measure intelligence or fluency with words, but rather
mental flexibility and creativity. Few people solve more than half of the 24
questions on the first try; most report getting answers after the test has been
set aside, at unexpected moments when their minds are relaxed. TAUTOLOGY OF THE WEEK: I don't want to hear any audible gasps from you, but I imagine that there have been plenty of harbingers of things to come over the New Year period.And a Latin phrase to start 2000: Sed me docuisti tuam postero mense venturam esse! (But you told me your mother was coming next month!) And because we ARE embarking on another year's adventure, you might be interested in one of my grandma's sayings: it's not how the wind blows that determines your direction - but how you set your sails. Regards, Jennifer To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to WritingTips-unsubscribe@onelist.com or go to the ONElist web site, at www.onelist.com, and select the User Centre link from the menu bar on the left. This menu will also let you change your subscription between digest and normal mode.
|
|
Home
| Contact
| Order
| Site
Map |Subscribe
Copyright 200 |